Skilled troubles mounting for controversial London lawyer

Skilled troubles mounting for controversial London lawyer
Skilled troubles mounting for controversial London lawyer

Skilled troubles are mounting for a London lawyer who tried to sue a choose after dropping a case marked by “incomprehensible authorized gibberish” and after being discovered by a courtroom to have made racist and misogynist feedback to opponents and others.

Article content material

Skilled troubles are mounting for a London lawyer who tried to sue a choose after dropping a case marked by “incomprehensible authorized gibberish” and after being discovered by a courtroom to have made racist and misogynist feedback to opponents and others.

Commercial 2

Article content material

The Regulation Society of Ontario’s tribunal suspended Oussama Hamza indefinitely Wednesday for allegedly refusing to adjust to society requests for paperwork associated to investigations of his actions.

He much more severe allegations about these actions, in line with a discover filed final month on the tribunal, together with making racist and sexist remarks on social media and courtroom paperwork and “hostile, inflammatory faces, inaccurate and discriminatory written statements in courtroom paperwork and in associated correspondence, and on his agency’s web site.”

In the meantime, Hamza’s current protection of a girl who was discovered by a courtroom to have used a faux identify to attempt to sue the CBC is also inflicting consternation in authorized circles.

Commercial 3

Article content material

Hamza couldn’t be reached for feedback Wednesday. Calls to his workplace telephone prompted a voice message directing individuals to his web site, earlier than saying goodbye and hanging up.

The web site was not working Wednesday. On the house web page was a discover asking individuals to signal a “petition in opposition to” to enter the web site. The discover didn’t say what the petition was opposing and the hyperlink to the remainder of the web site didn’t work.

Hamza started incomes public notoriety in fall 2020, when lawyer Vincent Rocheleau posted LinkedIn messages encouraging ladies to participate in a College of Ottawa venture about their experiences with the COVID-19 pandemic.

In line with courtroom rulings, Hamza replied on LinkedIn with messages about ladies’s contributions to academia, together with that “ladies did not write their historical past as a result of they did not care to take action” and “ladies simply do not care about historical past or philosophy” as a result of “ladies do not typically take into account being a thinker or historian ‘horny.’ ”

Commercial 4

Article content material

Hamza defended himself with feedback about his critics, together with that Rocheleau and one other particular person “had been colonizing and genociding the nation,” and that white ladies had been “elevating murderers of Indians and blacks they now fake to help in opposition to ‘villains’ like” him , in line with courtroom paperwork.

Rocheleau filed a grievance with the Regulation Society of Ontario that Hamza’s feedback have been racist and sexist.

One other Hamza publish led to a different grievance to the regulation society. The publish confirmed a photograph of regulation scholar Ismail Aderonmu, his spouse and youngsters, with speech and thought bubbles making derogatory feedback about every, in line with a courtroom determination.

Aderonmu’s grievance alleged posting such content material is “conduct unbecoming of a lawyer.”

Commercial 5

Article content material

The regulation society launched an investigation, however Hamza allegedly refused to co-operate, as an alternative going to courtroom in search of not less than $215,000 in damages.

Hamza additionally sought a number of orders, together with that:

  • He not be required to discuss with any choose sooner or later as Your Honor or Justice.
  • He “shall now not pay taxes to a European colonizer, however to a ‘pink Indian’ consultant in authorities.”
  • He now not pays charges to the regulation society, “which shall be declared racist.”
  • Aderonmu not be admitted to the bar.

In April 2021, Superior Courtroom Justice Thomas Heeney threw out the matter on a technicality, however made it clear the complete case was with out benefit.

The authorized discover and factum filed by Hamza “quantity to over 1,000 pages of rambling, pseudo-intellectual assaults on the (regulation society) and the opposite respondents, expressions of his opinion on their character and integrity, racist and misogynist assaults on the respondents and the judiciary, arguments that quantity to little greater than incomprehensible authorized gibberish,” Heeney wrote.

Commercial 6

Article content material

Hamza’s calls for about taxes and judges “can pretty be described as nonsense,” Heeney added. “They’re untenable at regulation and don’t have any likelihood of success.”

Heeney later ordered Hamza to pay prices of $33,000 to the regulation society and $12,742.86 to Aderonmu.

Hamza then sued, in French, the identical individuals plus Heeney. Superior Courtroom Justice Robin Tremblay threw out that motion as “frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of the courtroom” in a call revealed Jan. 17, 2022.

Hamza additionally took his case to the Ontario Courtroom of Attraction. It upheld Heeney’s determination, dismissed the attraction, and located Hamza’s authorized arguments “proceed to make racist and misogynistic statements and embrace private assaults on the respondents, . . . the movement choose and the respondents’ authorized counsel. We’re happy that the attraction is frivolous, vexatious and an abuse of the method of the courtroom.”

Commercial 7

Article content material

The regulation society started investigating Hamza in some unspecified time in the future, and a tribunal listening to discover in March alleged Hamza has contravened Regulation Society Act skilled conduct guidelines since Dec. 1, 2021, by failing to co-operate in a probe of his actions by refusing to totally reply to regulation society emails and letters.

After a listening to Tuesday, the tribunal dominated Hamza’s license could be suspended the following day till he responded to the correspondence. After that, he would stay suspended for one more month.

No listening to date has been set for the investigation of his actions. However the discover for the listening to outlines seven allegations about ongoing actions that started in 2020.

The allegations embrace that Hamza:

  • Made “discriminatory, racist, sexist or offensive feedback on social media, on his agency’s web site, in courtroom paperwork and in associated correspondence, which have been directed at members of the general public, the regulation society, complainants to the regulation society, members of the judiciary , different licensees and the Canadian justice system.”
  • Tried to impede a regulation society investigation by threatening to take authorized motion and “breached his responsibility to behave with integrity, particularly his responsibility to observe regulation and discharge all of his obligations to his purchasers, courts, the general public and different members of the occupation , by making hostile, inflammatory, inaccurate and discriminatory written statements in courtroom paperwork and in associated correspondence, and on his agency’s web site.”

Commercial 8

Article content material

Regardless of the sooner troubles, Hamza continued to observe regulation till this week, and that introduced him to a weird case involving the CBC over a March 2021 investigative piece by reporter Jennifer Chevalier into suspicions a psychological well being charity was run by a girl with a secret id .

An individual named Kamala Tiwari sued CBC for $20 million in damages. The broadcaster introduced a movement to dismiss the lawsuit, claiming Tiwari is a faux identify and the precise plaintiff was Althea Reyes.

Reyes, who has been declared a vexatious litigant underneath Sec. 140 of Ontario’s Courts of Justice Act, can’t begin a authorized motion with out a courtroom’s permission. A vexatious litigant is somebody deemed to have introduced ahead a number of, frivolous claims to the courts.

Commercial 9

Article content material

At a March 17 Zoom listening to, in line with the courtroom determination, Superior Courtroom Justice Heather Williams requested Hamza if his shopper was on the display screen. Hamza didn’t reply, saying the choose ought to ask the opposite events in courtroom as a result of they claimed to know who his shopper was. The choose then requested a girl on the display screen if she was the plaintiff. Hamza interrupted and once more instructed the choose to ask the opposite events, though the lady then indicated she was Kamala Tiwari.

Williams dismissed the swimsuit in a call revealed in Could, saying it was possible Reyes began the authorized motion underneath the identify Tiwari.

“Lastly, I need to add that Mr. Hamza’s participation on this matter was of concern to me, given his standing as an officer of the courtroom,” Williams added.

[email protected]

Twitter.com/RandyRatLFPress

Commercial

Commercial 1

Feedback

Postmedia is dedicated to sustaining a energetic however civil discussion board for dialogue and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Feedback could take as much as an hour for moderation earlier than showing on the positioning. We ask you to maintain your feedback related and respectful. We now have enabled e-mail notifications—you’ll now obtain an e-mail in the event you obtain a reply to your remark, there may be an replace to a remark thread you comply with or if a consumer you comply with feedback. Go to our Neighborhood Pointers for extra data and particulars on how one can modify your e-mail settings.